Most people who use porn do not have a problem with it. Around three-quarters, in studies that profile users statistically rather than asking them to self-diagnose. The question is which quarter you are in, and frequency will not tell you.
Problematic use tracks distress far better than it tracks how much someone uses. People who use frequently without distress and people who use frequently with it are distinguishable groups, and it is the distressed, impaired group that differs on mental-health measures. So the honest test is not "how many times a week" but three separate questions.
- Can you stop when you decide to? Not "is it hard"; everyone finds it hard. Have you set a limit and repeatedly blown through it despite intending not to?
- What is it actually costing you? Name specific things. Hours. Sleep. A conversation you avoided. Not "it's degrading me"; what, concretely, is gone?
- Would you still be distressed if nobody in your life disapproved? The hardest one and the most diagnostic. Feeling addicted is predicted by moral disapproval on top of how much someone actually uses.
If you can stop, the cost is nothing concrete, and the distress depends on disapproval, you may have a values conflict rather than a control problem. That is a real thing, and it is dealt with differently. If control is impaired and the cost is real, that is what the toolkit is for. Concluding it isn't your problem is a legitimate answer, not a failure.
Where this comes from
Read the full lesson: Is this even a problem for you? →
Sources and how strong they are (4)
- Well establishedFrequency of use alone is a poor indicator of problematic use. Distress, impaired control and functional impairment are what distinguish it.
- Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Zsila Á, Griffiths MD, Demetrovics Z, Orosz G 2018, J Sex Res 55(3):395-406, doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1291798, PMID 28276929 (PPCS development)
- Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Potenza MN, Orosz G, Demetrovics Z 2020, J Sex Med 17(4):793-811, doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.007
- WHO ICD-11, 6C72 (clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines) — https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#1630268048
- Kraus SW, Krueger RB, Briken P, First MB, Stein DJ, Kaplan MS, Voon V, Abdo CHN, Grant JE, Atalla E, Reed GM 2018, World Psychiatry 17(1):109-110, doi:10.1002/wps.20499, PMID 29352554, PMC5775124
- Well establishedMost people who use pornography do not have a problem with it. Profile studies place most users in a non-problematic group, but how many depends on how the profiling is done: cluster analysis of 830 adults in Vaillancourt-Morel et al. 2017 put 75.5% in a "recreational" profile, while latent profile analysis across three samples in Bőthe et al. 2020 put 68-73% in non-problematic low-frequency use and 19-29% in non-problematic high-frequency use, leaving 3-8% in problematic high-frequency use.
- Vaillancourt-Morel MP, Blais-Lecours S, Labadie C, Bergeron S, Sabourin S, Godbout N 2017, J Sex Med 14(1):78-85, doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.10.016, PMID 28011208
- Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Potenza MN, Orosz G, Demetrovics Z 2020, J Sex Med 17(4):793-811, doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.007
- Well establishedProblematic pornography use tracks distress better than overall frequency of use does. People who use frequently without distress and people who use frequently with it are distinguishable, and it is the problematic group that differs on mental-health measures - most clearly on depressive symptoms and self-esteem. Adult ADHD symptoms are a further replicated correlate (see C51), measured almost entirely by screening questionnaire rather than diagnosis. Loneliness is a further cross-sectional correlate of pornography use, measured once in a sample of 1,247 and modelled by its authors as potentially bidirectional.
- Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Potenza MN, Orosz G, Demetrovics Z 2020, J Sex Med 17(4):793-811, doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.007
- Butler MH, Pereyra SA, Draper TW, Leonhardt ND & Skinner KB 2018, J Sex Marital Ther 44(2):127-137, doi:10.1080/0092623X.2017.1321601, PMID 28448246 (published online 2017)
- Dropped as a source, because it does not resolve to a paper containing this claim — Grubbs et al. 2020, Clin Psychol Rev 82:101925, doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101925, PMID 33038740, whose systematic review of 415 studies cuts the other way on confidence
- Well establishedReligiosity and moral disapproval predict feeling addicted to pornography even after controlling for how much someone actually uses.
- Grubbs JB, Exline JJ, Pargament KI, Hook JN, Carlisle RD 2015, Arch Sex Behav 44(1):125-136, doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0257-z, PMID 24519108
- Grubbs JB & Perry SL 2019, J Sex Res 56(1):29-37, doi:10.1080/00224499.2018.1427204, PMID 29412013
More on patterns in the app.
The full 41-lesson course is in the app, every claim graded the same way, and an evening check-in that maps your own patterns. Free.
Coming to iOS and Android.