If I slipped once, is that a relapse? Do I reset to day zero?

There is no measured threshold, so the honest answer is that it is whatever you decided it was before it happened. In Marlatt's relapse-prevention model a lapse is a single instance and a relapse is a return to the pattern, and nothing in the research draws that line for you. What the research does say is that the reading you take is the part that matters, which is why a definition where one evening deletes everything costs more than it protects.

Well established

The word does a lot of work it was never built for. In the model the term comes from, a lapse is one instance and a relapse is a return to the pattern. The model's central finding is about what happens in between: after a lapse, attributing it to a permanent personal flaw predicts a full return to the behaviour. The lapse is not the hinge. The explanation is.

So "was that a relapse" is really two questions. The first is definitional, and you own it — no study will hand you a threshold. The second is what am I about to conclude about myself, and that one has an evidence base.

Decide the definition in advance, in writing. If you have not, you will end up writing it in the hour after a slip, which is the worst state you will ever be in for the job. A preregistered survey of 587 men in reboot communities found perceived relapse commonly followed by shame, worthlessness, sadness and in some cases suicidal thoughts. Notice what perceived is doing in that sentence. The shame does not follow from the behaviour, it follows from the reading of it — two people can do the same thing on the same night and only one of them has had a relapse, because only one of them held a definition that said so.

A brittle definition has a specific failure mode. If one slip sets everything to zero, then by ten past eleven the cost of the next hour is identical to the cost of the last one: the month is already gone, there is nothing left to protect, and the rest of the evening becomes a write-off. A rule that only ever fires after the thing it was meant to prevent is not doing much preventing.

It is also inaccurate on the measures researchers actually use. Frequency alone is a poor indicator of problematic use — distress, impaired control and functional impairment are what distinguish it — and problematic use tracks distress far better than it tracks how much someone uses. Someone who has gone from most nights to occasionally, with the distress dropping, has changed something real. A counter that resets would show them nothing at all.

A definition worth having answers three things, and you can write it in five minutes while you feel fine:

Keep the counter if you like it — knowing is better than not knowing. Just let it be one number among several rather than the verdict. The measure that moves first, and the one worth watching, is how quickly you get back on after a slip.

One evening is one evening. It is only day zero if you say so, and it is worth thinking hard before you say so.

Where this comes from

Read the full lesson: Abstinence or reduction? →

Sources and how strong they are (4)
  • Well establishedMarlatt's relapse-prevention model identifies the Abstinence Violation Effect: after a lapse, attributing it to a permanent personal flaw predicts a full return to the behaviour.Marlatt & Gordon 1985; Curry et al. 1987
  • Well establishedFrequency of use alone is a poor indicator of problematic use. Distress, impaired control and functional impairment are what distinguish it.Bőthe et al. 2018, 2020; ICD-11 CSBD criteria
  • Well establishedProblematic pornography use tracks distress better than overall frequency of use does. People who use frequently without distress and people who use frequently with it are distinguishable, and it is the problematic group that differs on mental-health measures - most clearly on depressive symptoms and self-esteem.Bothe et al. 2020, J Sex Med 17(4):793-811, doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.007
  • Well establishedA preregistered survey of 587 men in reboot communities found perceived relapse commonly followed by shame, worthlessness, sadness and in some cases suicidal thoughts. Forum cultures were also documented as hostile in ways unrelated to recovery.Prause & Binnie 2023, Sexualities

Your own patterns, not averages.

Evening check-ins turn lessons like this one into a plan for your own triggers, times and rooms. Free.

Coming to iOS and Android.

Get Nightshore
← All answersThe evidence register →