Here's where most quit-porn content oversells, so let's put actual numbers on it.
Relationships. The largest meta-analysis on this pulled together 50 studies, over 50,000 people, ten countries. It found no association at all between porn use and how people felt about their own bodies or themselves. It did find porn use associated with lower relationship and sexual satisfaction — and the size of that association was small, around r = −.11 to −.13. In plain terms: real, detectable, and nowhere near the dominant factor in whether a relationship works. When the analysis was split by sex, it reached significance for men only.
A separate analysis across 30 national surveys and 31 different relationship measures found something even more sobering for both camps: about half the tested associations were significantly negative, and about half were statistically null. That's what a genuine small effect looks like in messy data.
Shape of the curve. Some more recent work suggests the relationship isn't a straight line at all — occasional use and heavy use look different, with the negative associations concentrating at the high end. That's intuitive, and it's still being worked out.
What has stronger evidence than "porn use" itself: problematic porn use — the distressed, out-of-control kind — is more consistently linked to depressive symptoms, lower self-esteem and loneliness. Which fits the pattern in this whole field: the distress and the loss of control track the harm better than the behaviour does.
How to read this honestly: if you were expecting the science to hand you a devastating case against porn, it doesn't. If you were hoping it would tell you there's nothing here, it doesn't do that either. Small average effects across a population are entirely compatible with severe effects in a subgroup — and if you're taking this course, you might be in the subgroup. Population averages don't describe you. They just stop you inflating a personal problem into a civilisational one, which is a form of avoidance.
Takeaways
- The largest meta-analysis found a small association — r ≈ −.11 to −.13 — not a catastrophe.
- Half the tested associations across 30 surveys were null. That is what small looks like.
- Problematic use tracks harm far better than use does. Population averages aren't you.
Sources and how strong they are (8)
- Well establishedA meta-analysis of 50 studies (50,000+ people, ten countries) found pornography consumption unrelated to intrapersonal satisfaction (body and self), but associated with lower interpersonal satisfaction — sexual and relational — across cross-sectional, longitudinal and experimental designs. The association is small, and analyses by sex were significant for men only. Reported effect sizes include r = −.13 (95% CI −.16, −.10, k = 29) for men on interpersonal satisfaction, r = −.11 (95% CI −.14, −.07) for sexual satisfaction and r = −.09 (95% CI −.12, −.05, k = 24) for relational satisfaction.
- Wright PJ, Tokunaga RS, Kraus A & Klann E 2017, Human Communication Research 43(3):315-343, doi:10.1111/hcre.12108
- Well establishedAcross 30 national surveys and 31 relationship-quality measures, roughly half of the tested associations were significantly negative and roughly half were null.
- Perry SL 2020, Arch Sex Behav 49(4):1199-1213, doi:10.1007/s10508-019-01616-7, PMID 31897829
- Mixed evidenceSome studies find curvilinear rather than linear effects — occasional use looks different from heavy use.
- Willoughby BJ, Leonhardt ND & Augustus RA 2021, Computers in Human Behavior 125:106966, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106966
- Well establishedProblematic pornography use tracks distress better than overall frequency of use does. People who use frequently without distress and people who use frequently with it are distinguishable, and it is the problematic group that differs on mental-health measures - most clearly on depressive symptoms and self-esteem. Adult ADHD symptoms are a further replicated correlate (see C51), measured almost entirely by screening questionnaire rather than diagnosis. Loneliness is a further cross-sectional correlate of pornography use, measured once in a sample of 1,247 and modelled by its authors as potentially bidirectional.
- Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Potenza MN, Orosz G, Demetrovics Z 2020, J Sex Med 17(4):793-811, doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.007
- Butler MH, Pereyra SA, Draper TW, Leonhardt ND & Skinner KB 2018, J Sex Marital Ther 44(2):127-137, doi:10.1080/0092623X.2017.1321601, PMID 28448246 (published online 2017)
- Dropped as a source, because it does not resolve to a paper containing this claim — Grubbs et al. 2020, Clin Psychol Rev 82:101925, doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101925, PMID 33038740, whose systematic review of 415 studies cuts the other way on confidence
- Mixed evidenceAnxiety is associated with problematic pornography use, but the association is small and rests almost entirely on cross-sectional self-report. The only meta-analysis to pool it puts the correlation between pornography consumption and anxiety at r = 0.16 (95% CI 0.08-0.25) across six studies - significant among the cohorts measuring problematic or self-labelled addictive use (r = 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.30, six cohorts) and not significant in the single cohort measuring general use. The review that looked hardest at the question, covering 40 studies of anxiety and compulsive sexual behaviour, concluded that the relationship between the two is unclear.
- Tan JY, Low CE, Wong HJ, Sim IY, Lee CYC, Ding HR, Loke S, Ho CSH 2026, J Clin Med 15(13):5030, doi:10.3390/jcm15135030, PMID 42452491
- Borgogna, Duncan & McDermott 2018, Sex Addict Compulsivity 25:293-318, doi:10.1080/10720162.2019.1567410
- Guidry, Floyd, Volk & Moen 2020, J Sex Marital Ther 46:103-121, doi:10.1080/0092623X.2019.1654579
- Grant Weinandy JT, Lee B, Hoagland KC, Grubbs JB, Bőthe B 2023, J Sex Res 60(4):545-557, doi:10.1080/00224499.2022.2066616, PMID 35482896
- Grubbs JB, Stauner N, Exline JJ, Pargament KI, Lindberg MJ 2015, Psychol Addict Behav 29(4):1056-1067, doi:10.1037/adb0000114, PMID 26372200
- Mixed evidenceNo study shows that pornography use causes anxiety. The largest longitudinal test finds the link between problematic use and distress is a stable difference between people rather than something that moves within a person over time; a second large cohort finds small effects running in both directions. Treating problematic use has not been shown to reduce anxiety either, although the trial evidence on that point is far too thin to call it a null.
- Engelhardt R, Geppert R, Grubbs JB, von Oertzen T, Trommer D, Maes J, Kraus SW 2025, Addict Behav 169:108398, doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108398, PMID 40483829
- Wicki M, Studer J, Marmet S, Khazaal Y, Gmel G 2025, J Behav Addict 14(3):1250-1266, doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00078, PMID 40952791
- López-Pinar C, Esparza-Reig J, Bőthe B 2025, J Behav Addict 14(2):630-643, doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00018, PMID 40126561
- Well establishedADHD symptoms and problematic pornography use co-occur more often than chance. The association replicates across countries, sexes and designs; its size depends heavily on the sample and the instrument. In a large self-selected online sample (N=14,043) self-reported adult ADHD symptoms had a moderate association with problematic pornography use in men (β = .45) and a weak one in women (β = .26), and a moderate association with hypersexuality in both (β = .50 men, .43 women). In treatment-seeking samples the figure is a prevalence rather than a correlation: a meta-analysis of seven studies (N=730 patients with hypersexuality or paraphilic disorders) put ADHD at 22.6% (95% CI 17–29.4%), against pooled general-population estimates of 2.58% for persistent adult ADHD and 6.76% for symptomatic adult ADHD. Two things stop this being a prevalence figure for pornography users: the clinical samples are people already in treatment for hypersexuality, which is not the same population, and almost every large study measures ADHD with a screening questionnaire rather than a diagnosis — the screener used in the largest study flagged 18.1% of men and 21.4% of women, which its own authors attribute in part to the low specificity of adult ADHD screens.
- Bőthe B, Koós M, Tóth-Király I, Orosz G, Demetrovics Z 2019, J Sex Med 16(4):489-499, doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.312, PMID 30852107
- Korchia T, Boyer L, Deneuville M, Etchecopar-Etchart D, Lancon C, Fond G 2022, Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 272(8):1413-1420, doi:10.1007/s00406-022-01421-9, PMID 35551451
- Song P et al. 2021, J Glob Health 11:04009, doi:10.7189/jogh.11.04009, PMID 33692893
- Lewczuk K et al. 2024, J Atten Disord 28(4):512-530, doi:10.1177/10870547231215518, PMID 38180045
- Zhang Y, Chen L, Jiang X, Bőthe B 2022, Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(22):15221, PMID 36429937
- Niazof D, Weizman A, Weinstein A 2019, Compr Psychiatry 93:56-60, PMID 31349137
- Schreck B et al. 2023, Eur Addict Res 29(3):161-170, PMID 37088070
- El Archi S et al. 2023, J Atten Disord 27(7):731-742, PMID 36945199
- Mixed evidenceWhich way that association runs, and whether it should change anything about treatment, is unsettled. The only prospective test in a general-population cohort — 5,611 Swiss men followed from mean age 25.5 to 28.3 — found the paths run in both directions and at about the same size: baseline ADHD symptoms predicted later increases in problematic pornography use (β = 0.103, 95% CI 0.038 to 0.167) and baseline problematic pornography use predicted later increases in ADHD symptoms (β = 0.097, 95% CI 0.053 to 0.141), with overlapping confidence intervals. On mechanism the literature contradicts itself: one online survey found impulsivity mediated the link, while the only clinical study to decompose ADHD found that among 81 men in treatment for hypersexual behaviour it was the Problems with Self-Concept subscale that predicted sexual compulsivity, and that the impulsivity, inattention, memory and hyperactivity subscales added no predictive variance. And no treatment study has tested it: the most comprehensive meta-analysis of psychotherapy for problematic pornography use (20 studies, 2,021 participants) tested sample diagnosis, intervention type, delivery, format, comparison group, mean age, proportion male, number of sessions and proportion religious as moderators, and does not mention ADHD anywhere in its text. There is therefore no evidence that ADHD calls for a different method, and no evidence that it does not.
- Wicki M, Studer J, Marmet S, Khazaal Y, Gmel G 2025, J Behav Addict 14(3):1250-1266, doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00078, PMID 40952791, PMC12486285
- López-Pinar C, Esparza-Reig J, Bőthe B 2025, J Behav Addict 14(2):630-643, doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00018, PMID 40126561, PMC12231474
- Reid RC, Carpenter BN, Gilliland R, Karim R 2011, J Addict Med 5(2):134-140, doi:10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181e6ad32, PMID 21769059
- Zhang Y, Chen L, Jiang X, Bőthe B 2022, Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(22):15221, PMID 36429937
- Nearest thing to a treatment signal, and too weak to build on — Grassi G, Moradei C, Cecchelli C 2024, J Behav Addict 13(4):904-912, doi:10.1556/2006.2024.00060, PMID 39540888
- Pointing the other way — a retrospective TriNetX cohort of over 600,000 adolescents with ADHD, J Sex Med 2025;22(5):701-710, doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf054, PMID 40192478
- Not used — Jannini TB et al. 2026, Br J Psychiatry, doi:10.1192/bjp.2026.10691, PMID 42464926
Questions this lesson answers
More evidence in the app.
The full 41-lesson course is in the app, and every claim in it is graded the same way as the ones you just read. Free.
Coming to iOS and Android.