First the framing, because this question usually arrives wrapped in one. Nothing below is a moral position: this course does not hold one about porn or masturbation, and the argument works the same whether you think the behaviour is harmless or think it is the worst thing you do. The question is narrow. Does making yourself suffer after a slip make the next slip less likely?
Marlatt's relapse-prevention model is the reason to doubt it. What predicts a full return to the behaviour after a lapse is attributing it to a permanent personal flaw rather than to circumstances. Self-punishment is that attribution made concrete — you cannot impose a penalty without first settling what it is a penalty for, and the answer is always some version of because of what I am. The penalty is the verdict, delivered by the one person guaranteed to believe it.
The emotion research points the same way, with caveats worth stating plainly. Shame is a concealment emotion: it corresponds with attempts to deny, hide or escape the situation, and it predicts poorer behaviour-change outcomes than guilt, which is behaviour-focused and points outward toward repair. The two honest limits are that the protective thing is specifically shame-free guilt, and that most of this evidence concerns shame- and guilt-proneness as dispositions rather than one bad night. The direction is consistent, though, and the mechanism is easy to see in a private behaviour. Concealment is the condition it thrives in, and punishment is a reliable machine for producing concealment. Nobody tells a friend about the thing they are currently being punished for.
The communities that run on penance are the closest thing to a natural experiment. A preregistered survey of 587 men in reboot communities found perceived relapse commonly followed by shame, worthlessness, sadness and in some cases suicidal thoughts, with forum cultures documented as hostile in ways unrelated to recovery. Those are not the raw materials of a better week.
The secular version, explicitly
This research is usually read as being about religion, and that reading is too narrow. Religiosity and moral disapproval predict feeling addicted to pornography even after controlling for how much someone actually uses — and the interaction between frequency and disapproval predicts felt addiction for porn and for gambling, but not for tobacco or illicit drugs. The active ingredient is the disapproval, not the faith. If your objection is entirely secular — that it is degrading, that it is a waste of a life, that it makes you someone you would rather not be — you are inside the same interaction, and self-punishment is what acting it out looks like. You are entitled to keep the objection. What the evidence suggests is that punishing yourself with it is not how the gap closes.
What goes in its place
Not "go easy on yourself", which nobody believes anyway.
- Guilt about the behaviour, in plain words. That doesn't match what I want. What set it off? It is actionable, and it points at the next hour instead of at your character.
- A procedure instead of a penalty. Stop the episode now. Note the bare facts — time, situation, state beforehand. Do the thinking tomorrow, because nothing you conclude about yourself in the hour after a slip is reliable. Then change one thing.
- Know the difference between a consequence and a penance. A cold shower because it shifts your physical state is a tool. The same cold shower because you deserve it is a sentence. Identical water, different mechanism, and only one of them is aimed at the next evening.
- Do not let the penalty replace the review. Paying feels like acting, which is why it is popular and why it changes nothing. The cue, the state you were in and the two hours beforehand are the useful material, and they are still there in the morning.
Here is the test, if you want one. Does the thing you are about to do make the next hour more likely to go well, or does it only make you feel that you have paid? The second kind has a way of ending the very evening it was meant to rescue.
Where this comes from
Read the full lesson: Self-compassion isn't going soft →
Sources and how strong they are (5)
- Well establishedMarlatt's relapse-prevention model identifies the Abstinence Violation Effect: after a lapse, attributing it to a permanent personal flaw predicts a full return to the behaviour.Marlatt & Gordon 1985; Curry et al. 1987
- Well establishedShame is a concealment emotion associated with withdrawal and hiding, and predicts poorer behaviour-change outcomes than guilt, which is behaviour-focused and action-oriented.Tangney, Stuewig & Mashek 2007, Annual Review of Psychology 58:345-372, doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145, PMID 16953797, PMC3083636; Tangney & Dearing 2002
- Well establishedA preregistered survey of 587 men in reboot communities found perceived relapse commonly followed by shame, worthlessness, sadness and in some cases suicidal thoughts. Forum cultures were also documented as hostile in ways unrelated to recovery.Prause & Binnie 2023, Sexualities
- Well establishedReligiosity and moral disapproval predict feeling addicted to pornography even after controlling for how much someone actually uses.Grubbs et al. 2015; Grubbs & Perry 2019, J Sex Res
- Well establishedThe frequency × moral-disapproval interaction predicts felt addiction for pornography and gambling, but not for tobacco or illicit drugs.Grubbs et al. 2022, registered report, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
People doing the same thing, anonymously.
A community with no names and no counters, and a place to say how it went. Free.
Coming to iOS and Android.